<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Measure Data Quality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://xldennis.wordpress.com/2008/01/28/measure-data-quality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://xldennis.wordpress.com/2008/01/28/measure-data-quality/</link>
	<description>XL-Dennis on VSTO &#38; .NET &#38; Excel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:33:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jon Peltier</title>
		<link>http://xldennis.wordpress.com/2008/01/28/measure-data-quality/#comment-10632</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Peltier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xldennis.wordpress.com/?p=254#comment-10632</guid>
		<description>A table is also good. I started with a table to make my charts, three columns: {EM, ST, SV}, populated with Valid or Blank. This made it easier to get all 8 (i.e., 2^3) sets of conditions in the output, where you had only seven in the pie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A table is also good. I started with a table to make my charts, three columns: {EM, ST, SV}, populated with Valid or Blank. This made it easier to get all 8 (i.e., 2^3) sets of conditions in the output, where you had only seven in the pie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Wallentin</title>
		<link>http://xldennis.wordpress.com/2008/01/28/measure-data-quality/#comment-10631</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Wallentin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 09:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xldennis.wordpress.com/?p=254#comment-10631</guid>
		<description>Hi Jon and Dermot,

Thanks for Your comments which are highly appreciated. 

I&#039;m in favour of tables.
Mainly due to my shortcoming to create relevant charts models as well as due to my semi-color blindness.

I will update the chart accordingly. 

Kind regards,
Dennis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jon and Dermot,</p>
<p>Thanks for Your comments which are highly appreciated. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m in favour of tables.<br />
Mainly due to my shortcoming to create relevant charts models as well as due to my semi-color blindness.</p>
<p>I will update the chart accordingly. </p>
<p>Kind regards,<br />
Dennis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dermot</title>
		<link>http://xldennis.wordpress.com/2008/01/28/measure-data-quality/#comment-10630</link>
		<dc:creator>dermot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 21:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xldennis.wordpress.com/?p=254#comment-10630</guid>
		<description>Dennis, I find it hard to read the pie slices without text labels (the eye has to keep jumping between the pie and legend), also it&#039;s not clear which slices are &quot;good&quot; and which are &quot;bad&quot;. There&#039;s no way to take the information in at a glance, as busy executives need to do.

In this case, I think a Venn diagram would do the best job because it would clearly show the different combinations.

Alternatively, I would suggest a (sideways) bar chart with the bars arranged in order from best(nothing missing) to worst (all missing).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis, I find it hard to read the pie slices without text labels (the eye has to keep jumping between the pie and legend), also it&#8217;s not clear which slices are &#8220;good&#8221; and which are &#8220;bad&#8221;. There&#8217;s no way to take the information in at a glance, as busy executives need to do.</p>
<p>In this case, I think a Venn diagram would do the best job because it would clearly show the different combinations.</p>
<p>Alternatively, I would suggest a (sideways) bar chart with the bars arranged in order from best(nothing missing) to worst (all missing).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Peltier</title>
		<link>http://xldennis.wordpress.com/2008/01/28/measure-data-quality/#comment-10629</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Peltier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 20:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xldennis.wordpress.com/?p=254#comment-10629</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s not perpetuate the presentation paradigm that favors 3D exploded pie charts. Either a bar chart (http://www.freefilehosting.net/show/3b5j6) or a dot plot (http://www.freefilehosting.net/show/3b5j4) would have been a better choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s not perpetuate the presentation paradigm that favors 3D exploded pie charts. Either a bar chart (<a href="http://www.freefilehosting.net/show/3b5j6" rel="nofollow">http://www.freefilehosting.net/show/3b5j6</a>) or a dot plot (<a href="http://www.freefilehosting.net/show/3b5j4" rel="nofollow">http://www.freefilehosting.net/show/3b5j4</a>) would have been a better choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
